- Home
- About The Firm
- Do I Have a Medical Malpractice Case?
- Types of Medical Malpractice Cases
- Choosing your lawyer and working with him effectively
- When Do I need a Lawyer for My Medical Malpractice Case?
- How Do I Choose My Lawyer?
- What Questions Do I Ask When Choosing a Lawyer?
- Meeting With Your Lawyer
- How Do Lawyers Determine the Value of My Case?
- How Do I Effectively Work With My Lawyer?
- What is the Attorney Client Privilege?
- What are the Ethical Rules for Lawyers?
- What is a Contingency Fee?
- When and How Do I Fire My Lawyer?
- Screening the case
- Recoverable Damages in Medical Malpractice Cases
- Fees and Costs in Medical Malpractice Cases
- The Legal Process
- Medical Review Panels
- Litigation, Trial and Appeal of Medical Malpractice Cases
- How Does My Case Proceed?
- What is Discovery
- What is Evidence?
- What Motions Are Filed in My Case?
- The Value and Settlement of My Case
- Will my Case Likely Settle?
- Do these Cases Often Settle?
- How Do Lawyers Determine the Value of My Case?
- Settlement Evaluations
- Physician's Consent to Settle the Case
- Reporting of Physician to National Databank
- How Do Insurance Adjusters Settle Cases?
- What is Mediation?
- How Do I Know If I Have a Good Settlement Offer?
- The Trial Of My Case
- How Does The Appeals Process Work?
- Does the Supreme Court Get to Hear My Case?
- Media & Press
- Verdicts and Settlements
- Contact Us

What are Appeals and When are They Filed?
The primary objective of an appeal is to give an aggrieved party recourse to a superior tribunal for the correction of the judgment of an inferior court. In most jurisdictions, a party to the litigation has an unqualified right to appeal from an adverse final judgment without the need to demonstrate a direct monetary interest.
Generally, an appellate court is bound to adjudge a case before it in accordance with the law existing at the time of its decision. However, if the law has changed since the suit was filed, the court may have to apply the law as it existed at the time the suit was filed.
Specific time restrictions are placed on a party seeking to appeal the decision of a lower court. In most jurisdictions, these restrictions may be 30-60 days depending on the type of appeal that is filed. In one type of appeal, a party can suspend an action to collect the judgment until the court of appeal can decide the case. This may require the appealing party to post a bond to protect the non appealing party from missing a chance to collect the judgment. In some jurisdictions, this is known as a suspensive appeal, or an appeal which suspends the execution of the judgment. This is the type of appeal that has a shorter period, in most jurisdictions, 30 days to file.
The second type of appeal allows the party who received the judgment to attempt to collect on the judgment while the appeals court decides the issues. In some jurisdictions, this is known as a devolutive appeal. The deadline for filing this type of appeal is usually longer than the deadline to file a suspensive appeal, usually 60 days.
In most jurisdictions, the court of appeal is not at liberty to reverse any decision of the lower court (either a verdict from a jury or judge), even if they disagree with the verdict. The issue to be resolved is not whether the jury or judge was wrong, but whether the conclusions were reasonable. A lower court’s findings of fact cannot be reversed on appeal unless the appealing party, (the appellant), demonstrates that a reasonable basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court and the finding is clearly wrong. Thus, a court of appeal will usually defer to the trial court regarding factual findings and not reverse the decision unless it is manifestly erroneous.
This is also true with respect to the determination of fault. An appellate court will generally not disturb a lower court’s allocation of fault between the parties unless it too is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
An appellate court will review a lower court’s determination of law without giving the deference it gives to issues of fact. Thus, unlike factual determinations, if the court of appeals disagrees with the lower court’s application of law, it can reverse the decision.